Would the Government let Americans be killed? by Matt Giwer © 2002 [June]
Let the first one happen and stop the rest. With regard to 9/11 people find it difficult to accept the government could possibly have let it happened. That is contrary to history. First WTC attack, 26 Feb 1993 There was an FBI informant who was also the supplied of the explosive. The following are a matter of trial record and uncontested testimony. He suggested both supplying a fake explosive and sabotaging the detonator to the FBI. He was overruled on both. Six dead, over 1000 injured, and more than $500 Million in damages and the real possibility one of the two World Trade Center towers brought down with 25,000 deaths. Gulf War The US gave Saddam Hussein, ex-CIA agent and ally in its war against Iran, the go ahead to invade Kuwait then created the Gulf War because of it. 390 Americans died in that war. Vietnam War Consider the Gulf of Tonkin incident. It was a fraud perpetrated by the government upon the American people to expand the Vietnam war. As a direct result 50,000 additional Americans were killed. While on the Gulf of Tonkin, it required a conspiracy involving at least the ship's officers and a good fraction of the crew and the entire chain of command from the ship to President Lyndon Johnson. Literally hundreds of people were involved and it was a conspiracy. No one blew the whistle. To this day, there has not been one public cursing of Johnson by the American government. Almost everyone takes it in stride as an expected function of government. In other words, the government has survived exposure and has every reason to expect to survive again. World War II Only a few die-hards still hold President Roosevelt was surprised by Pearl Harbor. Almost everyone who has looked into it agree he provoked war with Japan and invited the attack on Pearl Harbor and knew about it before it occurred. As a consequence of that some 800,000 Americans died in WWII in addition to the 1,300 at Pearl Harbor. Regarding the public response, there is a monument to him in Washington rather than his body exhumed and desecrated. WWI In that war the US government does not appear to have been directly at fault. Spanish-American War Even US history books agree the war was trumped up by the US. Latin American Wars The US has a long history of attacks and invasions of Latin American countries solely to protect the financial interests of a few wealthy Americans owning the National Fruit Company. If the US has made war over bananas who is surprised the US would make war over oil? In the long history of war governments have shown themselves interested in having wars. In history there are no good or bad sides. The winner has nothing to do with which side struck the first blow. There is no justice in war. History praises the greatest conquers like Alexander, Caesar and William the Conqueror. There is every reason to believe governments have not changed and that the US government is like all other governments. The US has a major strategic interest in oil not only for itself but for the rest of the countries in the modern global economy. Oil is much more important than bananas ever were and the US has invaded Latin American countries over bananas. Why didn't I mention deaths on the other side? As the US holds and Timothy McVeigh implement they are only collateral damage.
Page reads: 3767