If Lee Harvey Oswald were behind 9/11 by Matt Giwer, © 2002 [June]
Why did the hijackers act in a manner to draw attention to themselves? Why were those actions guaranteed to prevent their entrance into heaven on the night before they suicided? Why did they leave Islamic literature in the rental car at the airport? Why did one of the bags not get on the plane and why was filled with Islamic literature? Why did they pick of fight over a parking space at Logan Airport? Why did they leave a copy of the Koran in a strip joint? Why did they pay bar tabs with $100 bills when they money supposedly came from ATMs which do not dispense them? Meaning they deliberately got large bills to use to pay. Why were they drinking? If they did all of these things then an absolute certainty is they were not fundamentalist Muslims. There are many other obvious questions to which there is no clear answer if the current story is correct. There is a clear answer if we assume whoever did it was setting up Arabs to be held responsible. Everything they did was to draw attention to themselves and be certain they were remembered. Everything we know indicates they were framed. In favor of it being a frame-up is that 9 of 19 dead people the government has named as hijackers are either alive or died years before the event. Of course the hijackers could have been using false identities but in light of the above they were trying to draw attention to themselves so what was the purpose of false identification? And should not the false identification have been of other than Arabs, say French or German or even American or Israeli? Lets say Lee Harvey Oswald had followed a similar pattern. He would have gone to a different bar every night and complained about President Kennedy and talked about shooting him. He would have been obnoxious in those bars and paid with large bills which he went out of his way to get to use. He would have bought a rifle in a local gun store and paid by check. He would have practiced at local shooting ranges and made certain people knew who he was. He would have left his wallet in the Texas Schoolbook Depository Building next to the spent rounds and the rifle. He would have had large amounts of anti-Kennedy literature in his home. And if he had missed Kennedy, everything he had left around and did would have been enough to identify and convict him as the shooter. These hijackers, left a path directly to themselves and to Islam. The manner in which they left the evidence and the type of evidence was certain to convict them and implicate Islamic fundamentalism in the event they were unsuccessful. It all guaranteed, if a failure, others would be implicated and they would be watched carefully making a future successful attack difficult if not impossible. It has all of the indications of a one time operation with the objective of implicating Islam and taking out a few buildings along the way. This is not reasonable behavior for conspirators. It is reasonable behavior if they were framed and it was done by someone else.
Page reads: 3773