|
This article is not meant to stand alone but to compliment other articles on
this website but as I have linked it, let me explain. There are many ancient
documents which are translated as or refered to in bible terms which implies
there is some credible content in the bible. The point of this article is to
discredit that by showing how to tell fake translations.
The first rule is very simple. The suffix ite as in Canaanite originated in
the King James translation of the bible into English. There is no such
suffix in any ancient language. So any time you read any translation or any
reference to any people with an ite suffix it is a fake translation.
The next is like the last paragraph. There is no mention in any ancient text
of Canaan. There is nothing, period. So any time you read of Canaan or the
double nonsense of CanaanITE you know the translator is lying or an idiot.
This is also true of all of the JebusITEs and every other bible mentioned
ITEs. There is no evidence of any such people in any form whatsoever.
Not only is ITE a fiction none of the people refered to as ITEs in the bible
have any foundation in fact. They are figments of the translators'
imaginations.
Of course very few ever read the actual translators. But the rule applies to
anyone who mentions anything above. They are either knowingly lying or they
are simply dumb people. There is no need to be dumb and take them seriously.
And when I said there is no evidence of any ITEs I meant no Israelites
either. All of these facile translations which appear to support the bible
are false translations. All references to anything like them are bible
imaginings without physical evidence.
Fake means fake. What do you want from me? To remain silent on this
nonsense? Sorry. I am not built that way. If there is no physical evidence
of any such people calling themselves by such names or being called by such
names there is no reason a rational person would assume there ever were such
people.
|