There is a long story of connected events in this time frame that is rarely told. Nothing I am going to say is anything new it is only the connections that I am going to hightlight that you may not have heard before. I will tell you up front that even suggesting things like you are going to read is often called antisemitic.

      Because all of these are all public information this is not to be taken as something that is hidden behind the scenes. Nor should they be taken as the secret explanation of events. These are all just other factors out of thousands of factors over a quarter of a century that lead to our post WW II world.

      I wish to point out the often overlooked threads of Russian Communist and Jewish involvement in WW I and WW II against Germany. For example, the primary reason the US was tricked into WW I was the British forgery of the Zimmerman note. What is overlooked is the World Jewish Congress agreement with England to particitpate in stirring up American sentiment against Germany because of that note.

      In none of these matters were either the Russian Communists nor the Zionist jews the masterminds behinds the scenes. They were simply active participants among many others. As a matter of perspective, these are only a few thousand words and a reasonably complete history of this time frame would require as many volumes as I have words.

      For decades apologists for communism tried to distance it from both fascism and nazism. Yet Mussolini clearly stated that he made up the name fascism because the Catholic Church was so opposed to communism. Hitler privately saw himself as being a practical implementer of marxism as opposed to the theorists in Russia.

      The practical difference between them and the communists was public versus private ownership of the means of production. In all three cases the means of production were completely under the control of the state and directed to the political policies of the state. As a practical point, fascism and nazism made the profit of the owners the incentive to do what was right regardless of what the bureaucrats ordered.

      Another fact lost today, but well known and often mentioned by people like Winston Churchill early in this century, is that the early revolutionary communist movement was primarily Jewish. Estimates ran as high as 90% of Communist Party members being Jewish. This may be an undesirable fact to talk about today but that does not make it less of a fact. (It is a poorly kept secret that Senator Joe McCarthy chose jewish lawyers for his legal staff in his hunt for American Communists to avoid the label of antisemitic.)

      The context of the rise of these political systems is set against the First World War. Lenin and Trotsky brought down the Tzar not by the force of their principles and political thought but by exploiting the hundreds of thousands of homeless, injured war veterans on the streets of all of the cities of Russia. They did not sell communism but rather the end of the war.

      Their final victory was handed to them when the Tzar took personal control of the army and thus was seen as having personal responsibility for the continuing defeats. The prior policy had been to blame failure on the generals and shoot them. Thus the Tzar gave up his political insulation from the military failures.

      Little is commonly known about the pro-German events immediately prior to the entry of the US into WW I. Most people know that there was a stalement in trench warfare. Few know that Germany offered France and England peace and that the terms were simply that everyone withdraw to their previous borders. That is, to pretend the war never happened.

      England had no real choice in that unless they could get unlimited support and manpower from the US. US support had been limited to what England could pay for in one way or another. Any American who wanted to fight in that war had to first go to Canada and join up there.

      At that point, the World Jewish Congress and England made an agreement. The former would work to get the US into the war if the latter would make Palestine a Jewish homeland. The former delivered and the latter produced the Balfour Declaration.

      Now that stands out a bit, the World Jewish Congress suddenly shows up in the middle of a war between nations. That sounds a bit strange today but it is hardly different from Amnesty International or the Red Cross intruding in wars. But then why did they intrude in this manner?

      Some decades earlier a movement called Zionism was founded. its purpose was to recreate Israel in the middle east and for Jews to return there. Although mentioning it has a touch unpleasant sound as one risks being called antisemitic if the incorrect words are said about it, it was an open movement at the time.

      It remained a purely Jewish movement embraced by no nation. The usual national response was, if our jewish citizens wish nothing more than to leave the country of their birth and live some place else then we invite them to leave immediately. Words to that effect were echoed by Jewish and Christian political leaders alike.

      Although it did not achieve much internal expression within nations it became a politically powerful movement and found its international expression in the World Jewish Congress. So we see the WJC was simply a convenient front for the Zionist Movement as due to its world wide reach could promise support within the Uniteed States.

      The support they were able to deliver was a change from pro-german isolationism to support of a militant anti-german spirit. The British needed only to seed it with the Zimmerman Note and there was an immediate aboutface by American jews and jewish organizations.

      Prior to WW I, US Jews were strongly pro-Germany. After the agreement was made with England they became anti-Germany and demanded an end to isolationism. England simply created the Zimmerman Note and American Jews hyped it as a cause for war.

      It is interesting to note the parallel in this between the two world wars. Prior to war breaking out between Russia and Germany, the communists in the US were leading isolationists. After war broke out they were hellbent upon the US joining in the war against Germany. There were not secret messages transferred or orders given, the publications of the Worker's World International and other communist organizations simply attacked Hitler and the Communist Party of the United States, CPUS, simply followed suit. So too it was with American jewish organizations during WW I.

      The only common thread here is the heavy jewish involvement in communism. That is not outstanding either. For example, Irish-Americans have been the primary financial support for the Irish Republican Army for a century and that has always been a terrorist organization.

      As a result US finanical and manpower support of England and France in WW I Germany lost and the Treaty of Versailles was imposed upon Germany. This was imposed by England's blockade of Germany after the armistance causing massive starvation in Germany. The assurances that Wilson was given, that his proposed treaty would become the basis for the settlement of the war (which was also a condition of German surrender), was ignored by England and France as planned.

      In other words the US was tricked, used and discarded as planned. That, more than anything else, was the cause of the sharp and drastic return of the US to isolationism. Regardless of the official position of the US government the people were well aware of what happened, they had been used.

      As a result of this treaty parts of Germany, better known as the Austro-Hungarian empire were given to other countries. Twenty years later Germany reclaiming those lands would be used as examples of German aggression. For example, what is referred to as the invasion of Poland was rather the reclaiming of Silesia that was a part of Germany before it was given to Poland by the imposed treaty.

      Now one grants the borders in Europe had been fluid since the Roman Empire expanded into it. And one further grants that Silesia was no exception. But there was a major difference in Silesia, Poland was expelling German descent citizens of Poland into Germany and keeping their property. Germany maintained refugee camps on the Polish border for nearly two decades because of this expulsion policy of Poland.

      One more point about communism in Europe, all countries had communist parties, including Germany, France, England, and that influence even spread to the US. The communist take over of Russia was not the beginning of attempts to take over countries, rather it was simply the first success. The communist parties in the other countries had the same objective as that of Russian communists.

      And all over the world marxists under various names including communist, fascist and nazi were organized and nations feared revolution. In the 1920s Churchill gave a rather mild response to a communist lead strike. In return the communists attempted to play it up into a cause for armed rebellion.

      Whatever one says about the Nazis has to be considered in light of the times in which it occurred. No one can understand the casual antisemitism in Germany in the 20s and 30s without knowing it was as bad or worse in the rest of Europe and the US at the time. Otherwise it is like viewing women's rights during the Frence Revolution in terms of 1990s US women's rights policies. (Granted there are many people who prefer such simplistic thought.)

      The two countries in the weakest political position after WW I were Italy and Germany. Five years after the war Mussolini rose to power in Italy promising strong central leadership, something that went back to the Roman Empire and had been so recently reinforced by Garibaldi. This was in no small part due to his public opposition to the communist party of Italy for which he gained the support of the Vatican.

      The political situation did not stabilize in Germany for another decade. In that time the literally warring political parties formed fragile ruling majorities in the Reichstag under the kludge constitution imposed on her after the war. Finally in 1933 Hitler as the leader of the National Socialist Germany Worker's Party, NSDAP, was given the opportunity to form a government in the manner of any Pariamentary form of government.

      Between the end of WW I and Hitler forming a government feelings about Jews went from bad to worse. As after any lost war there was a search for the cause of the loss. It was quite clear that the entry of the US into the war against Germany and its military and financial support were the cause.

      It was a simple step to go from that to identifying the reason for the US entry, the sudden change from isolationism to a pro-intervention stance by American Jews and from there to the Balfour Declaration as a quid pro quo for that change.

      Then too, when Germany was into the post WW I hyperinflation, German Jews appeared to have near unlimited supplies of hard foreign currencies and were buying up everything of value. They also seemed to have the money to pay the bribes to get the choice government and university jobs. In those few years German Jews went from a merchant and artisan class the social elite of the country.

      Now of course many have been screaming antisemitic for several paragraphs now. Please keep in mind that I am not saying anything that is not documented. It is simply not so well known.

      There is only a little bit of speculation, such as the meeting between the WJC and England as it is still covered by the Official Secrets Act of England 80 years later. There is no speculation regarding the change of US Jews from isolation to anti-German nor is the Balfour Declaration as it would have otherwise come out of nowhere. England was not the kind of country to even talk about giving up territories it controlled for nothing.

      Nor is it in question that regaining Palestine as the Jewish homeland was the objective of the Zionist movement within Judaism. While today one can almost be called antisemitic for suggesting that the Zionists were anything more than a social club, the movement and its members were praised in Israel when it started. The promotion of Zionism is still a formal objective of the State of Israel today. The difference that references to Zionism are now made by reference to the Law of Return although if you look closely you can find references to official Israeli support of Zionism.

      Far from being antisemitic, this is simply a recounting of what in fact happened and how it was perceived in Germany. The truth can not be antisemitic. Nor can the truth remain out of the discussion simply because it is considered unpleasant.

      The point of the digression on how German Jews were perceived to be, in addition to their being the primary members of the violent revolutionary Communist Party of Germany, the proximate cause of Germany losing WW I. It was not in any manner limited to Hitler nor was he necessary to excite the feelings. To the people of Germany he spoke quite clearly of what was common knowledge, the defeat of Germany in WW I could be traced to Jews worldwide including German resident Jews.

      Nor was the racial interest in the peoples of the world invented by either Hitler or the Nazis. It was a common way to express things early in this century. In Britain it was common to refer to the English, Scottish and Irish races. Every country put their own "race" on the top of the heap; the Germans were no different.

      The French considered themselves a race as did the Germans and the Poles and the Russians. And of course each held with their own superiority. And without hesitation all of then considered the Jews to be a race and even the Jews considered themselves to be a race, and many still do today. And although I have not come across direct contemporary reference it is difficult to believe that Jews did not consider their race superior to all others. After all, their own writings refer to them as the chosen people of god.

      And for all the 'then and now' bluster about race, the Jewish idea that one could be a Jew by birth mother and the condemnation of Jews marrying non-Jews made them the closest thing to an actual separate race in Europe at the time. If Hitler is to be condemned for his ideas a race then one first has to show what he held that was unique and what different ideas the Jews held.

      For example the German rules held that one jewish and one nonjewish parent made a person half jewish. Jews held that if the mother was the jew then the person was a full jew and if the father was the jew then that person was not a jew. The Nazis did nothing regarding race that was not only common at the time but closely supported by jewish teachings at the time and down to the present day. (Yes, present day jews still support silly notions of race like those used in Nazi Germany.)

      Thus in the first half of this century the political struggle in Europe directly involved jews both as communists and as zionists. Germany had already suffered from the zionist deal with England in the loss of the war and all of the consequences of that loss. Further Germany faced the take over of the country by the communists who were primarily Jews.

      The actual fraction of German Jews who were involved with zionism and/or communism is not known. However when the Nazis opened the first camps in 1933 and up through 1939 no jew was sent to any such camp because they were jews. If any were sent it was because they were communists or had violated some law usually a law regarding political activities.

      Having been involved with zionism was never a crime in Nazi Germany. In fact as it was the object of both the Zionists and the Nazis to get the Jews out of Germany, the cooperated in doing so, some might say collaborated. Zionism was the only Jewish organization allowed to operate in Nazi Germany as was even the only non-Nazi organization permitted to fly its flag.

      At the time of the rise of the zionist movement it was debated in England. To paraphrase the conclusion, should we imagine our jewish subjects to have as their fondest wish to leave england for another country then we should by all means strongly encourage them to leave now for any other country. To put it bluntly, zionists were considered to be people of uncertain loyalty and rightly so as Germany discovered.

      Into all of this came the NSDAP which held the largest number of seats in the Reichstag when the previous government collapsed. As the leader of the NSDAP, Hitler was offered the opportunity to form a ruling majority government, which he did. It was all quite constitutional and legal as when Hitler and his NSDAP took over the country.

      We may not like the idea of it being legal to take over the country but that was a feature of their constitution. It is why many in the US are very concerned about the power of the President to rule by executive orders and cringe at what he can do should he declare a national emergency. Once the Nazis had control of the government, they declared a national emergency.

      Although ten years earlier a hotheaded young Hitler and his small party did attempt to take over the government by force, they spent their time in prison for it. In 1933 they took over the government quite legally. That Hitler was able to do that is a testament to a weak constitution and a citizenry new and uncommitted to democracy.

      The NSDAP did in fact grow up by violence in 1920s Germany. Of course that appears wrong to us but again, they must be judged in terms of their times. Almost all political parties in Germany in the 1920s were violent and had their enforcement arms. The brawls the Nazis engaged in were with the enforcement arms of other political parties.

      Thus the Nazi Party grew up like any German political party of the time. Other than the violent realities, it was a collection of platform statements, planks we call them in the US. They did not call for a dictatorship but rather for strong, central leadership. But it is not clear that that call was different from the calls within the United States under the Articles of Confederation for a strong central government that is now the US Constitution.

      Appended to the end are the 25 points (planks) of the NSDAP platform with comments on each of them. Although one can search them for "evil" it is better to attempt to understand them. They certainly explain why Germans voted for the party as there is no clear evidence that they were voting for any extraordinary form of evil.

      The first point refers to the reunification of Germany. It refers to the parts of Germany that were given to other countries after WW I. It was fulfilling this point that are called examples of German expansionism.

      If you read through the rest of them you will see they reflect the political conditions in Germany as a result of WW I that I have discussed above. You will also note many points that are clearly Marxist such as the abolition of unearned income, communalization of wholesale markets, and land reform.

      At the time in western Europe there were two politically stable countries, England and France. In central Europe there was stable Italy and unstable Germany and a handful of small countries that barely mattered. In eastern Europe there was dozens of small countries that in many cases held parts of Germany and all of which were the targets of their communist parties under the leadership of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, CPSU, and can not be considered stable.

      Italy had maintained its stability under Mussolini by outlawing other parties and in particular the Communist Party of Italy, CPI. However, in Italy they did continue to work against Mussolini which was well known, holding illegal political meetings and the like. The Nazis prevented that by putting them into camps. Again, that they happened to be primarily Jewish had nothing to do with them being Jewish, only communist.

      Today that sounds improper to say the least. However, at the time, these communists made no secret about attempting to take over Germany by peaceful means if possible and violent means if necessary. Sending them to camps was no different from rounding up members of known terrorist organizations and sending them to camps; improper in the US at the moment but then we have had no openly avowed violent and widespread political party to deal with as yet.

      And keep in mind that in 1942 the US sent American citizens of Japanese descent to camps for no reason other than their being of Japanese descent. Not that they had sympathies for Japan, not that they planned to use violence, but for no other reason than being of Japanese descent. One grants that may have been the lowest point in our country's history but it does not make the German camps any worse.

      If you have gone over the party platform you can see a mix of reasonable planks but that several are open to abuse. Although most are out of line with our form of democracy none of them are particularly out of line with the circumstances in Germany at the time. Even those unacceptable as marxist or contrary to our Bill of Rights existed in our democratic allies and even exist in the US, such as the Marxist land reform in Hawaii upheld by the Supreme Court some years ago.

      While the Nazis were working to restore both the ecomony of Germany and territorial Germany itself, the CPSU were were working to promote revolutions in other countries including Germany. Germany having used camps to shut off the clearest danger of revolution was preparing for war with the Soviet Union. This is not a secret and both countries knew a war was coming and both countries were planning for it.

      In the course of reunifying Germany other European nations protrayed this as expansion. But there was one group that protrayed Hitler and the Nazis as evil from the moment they took power and that is the World Jewish Congress. Hitler was immediately referred to as a murderer even though there was no evidence he was any more of a murderer than any of the other political parties in Germany at the time.

      It was well known that government jobs and prestigious positions were sold all through the 1920s; either through contributions to the parties in power for government jobs or the hiring authorities in universities or flat out bribery to anyone who could hire to an official position. A license in a profession required a bribe. It was a wide open and a corrupt system that had descended upon Germany as a result of post WW I conditions.

      No one has ever made a secret of this corruption nor that Jews came into those jobs in the 1920s. In the 1920s German Jews went from the craftsman and artisan class to the social elite.

      What has not been commonly done is to put the two events together. Jews may have been qualified, outstandingly qualified, but they would not have gotten the jobs without the bribes. That was a fact of German life.

      That they were unlikely to be qualified for the jobs should be obvious. Of course one can point to their scientists but science is based upon verifiable merit. Positions in the humanities, those which are supposed to preserve the country's culture, are not positions of verifiable merit.

      Thus the sudden growth in the number of Jews in those university positions that were supposed to preserve the German culture were a serious cause for concern. It would be no different than an identifiable group in US universities downplaying American culture to the benefit of other cultures. Some say that is happening.

      And in fact Jews did have the majority of those positions. Therefore, facts being facts, they had not earned those positions but had bribed their way into them. The Nazis moved to set that situation to rights by setting racial quotas for the jobs and eliminating bribery as a means of getting them. Yes, jews suffered the most. But also they, as a group, had paid the most bribes to get those jobs.

      This was unacceptable to the World Jewish Congress. They quickly called a meeting in Belgium and called for a worldwide boycott of Germany until those who had bribed their way into those jobs were given them back. Sort of like demanding that a politician stay bought.

      In response the Nazis organized a ONE DAY boycott of jewish merchants in Germany. It did in fact last one day. The jewish boycott was never lifted.

      To get around this boycott the Zionists worked out of barter system with Germany which worked such that Germany received to actual increase in hard currency. They successfully defended this method before the World Jewish Congress and continued to receive trade in kind in exchange for German agricultural equipment.

      In retrospect the Jewish boycott does not appear to have been particularly effective but it was unclear at the time just what would happen. One of the things that may have mitigated the effect is the nationalization of the wholesale market. German jews did have control of a major share of that market so the boycott lost its support on the German side.

      But as to the strength of the German reaction, the year was 1933. Germany had been in dire economic straights since the end of WW I. In 1933 it was also the depth of the worldwide Depression. Things had gone from bad to worse and the WJC was attempting to pile on top of that.

      Personally I have met jews who continue to boycott German products but not one of them has been aware that the boycott started in 1933. But it is clear that the Nazis were not about to reinstate those who had benefitted from the corruption of the 1920s to relieve the boycott. Pardon me, but no nation should reward corruption regardless of the duress.

      Later those laws were expanded to include all jews, such being the slippery slope of the drastic solution they chose. In hindsight of course the proper course of action should have been to prosecute all parties to such corruption. However, such could have been said of the solutions the US tried in the middle of the Depression. Responses were not so much well considered but desparate.

      Official corruption was rather rare inside Nazi Germany and was severely punished particularly when Nazis were corrupt. On one hand it was unnecessary as one had to be a party member to work for the government and to be a party member one had to contribute a fraction of one's income to the party. Thus the party had a steady source of income directly from the public treasury. (This is the same way the CPSU financed itself.)

      Any corruption within the government would be by a party member thus permitting two forms of punishment, civil meaning prison and fines and party meaning loss of employment. Of course corruption came back at the highest levels when the abuse of absolute power started but that is hardly more than human nature.

      But clearly the confrontation that was shaping up was expected to be between Russia and Germany. They were the only major countries building up their arms at the time although Italy was trying to do something military in Ethiopia. England and the US had drastically cut land forces and France had established its Maginot Line to hide behind.

      Countries seriously expecting war build up their military rather than decrease it. When those two countries are facing each other you can be certain they are expecting to fight each other. Clearly those two countries were Russia and Germany.

      The World Jewish Congress was setting up Germany as the bad guy in the confrontation because of Germany's means of dealing with german jews who had participating in over 15 years of corruption. But also given the broad base of Jews in the Soviet Communist Party there was a chance of a major future payoff from the Soviet Union as well as punishing Germany.

      During this time the Zionists began promoting emmigration from Germany but even here the Zionists worked out a deal with the Nazis. It worked such that the only place to which a German Jew could emigrate with most of their property in tact was to Palestine. Zionists attempt to present this as having achieved the only exception to the Nazi rule whereas it was solely for the benefit of Zionism.

      In the process of this lack of loyalty the Germans escalated their response and ultimately all full blooded jews and most half jews and some quarter jews found themselves in camps just as did Japanese Americans but for no reason. Of course the full, half and quarter were by genetics as the jewish rules were all or nothing. Rather consider the earlier response of other countries to the Zionist movement, german jews by their wanting to leave were considered fundamentally disloyal.

      The WJC, which started calling Hitler and the Nazis traitors as early as 1933, did not cease its propaganda because of the war, in fact it redoubled the efforts. Stories of ill treatment in the camps were circulated but it was not until late 1943 that stories of extermination began to circulate. It is to be noted that stories of ill treatment within the camps was never independently verified. We have only end of war conditions that were ever discovered.

      The idea that such a thing was actually happening, particularly in places where there were regular communication and transfers and the like for years without such word, is difficult to explain unless it was WJC propaganda. It is like the same camps existed in two different realities.

      On one hand the camp would have an extensive underground that maintained contact with the outside world that did not report such things and on the other hand that same camp could only report exterminations from a very few of the hundreds of escapees.

      One one hand we had camps where there were hundreds of regular escapes without extermination reports and on the other those same camps where a few people who can never prove having been there with absolute horror stories.

      On one hand we have all of those underground contacts with England and suddenly from Switzerland comes reports of extermination.

      It is clear that certain stories were being advertised outside of the common and normal channels of communication with the people in the camps. It is a situation that can only be explained as a propaganda effort.

      Be that as it may, lets look at the post war confrontation at the Nuremberg trials. All of the extermination claims were generated by the communists from the Soviet Union abetted by jews from there and eastern Europe whose political affiliation was not investigated but most likely communist. The only exception to this was the US claiming to have found a gas chamber in Germany proper but within ten years this claim was dropped.

      The claimed extermination methods were all over the map and gassing was not even in the majority. Electrocution, suffocation, steaming, burning alive, shooting, hammers, axes, scythes, everything but golf clubs were indicted as the means of mass extermination. The story was nothing like it is today.

      So here we have the primarily jewish CPSU abetted by other jews claiming their defeated political and military enemy was exterminating jews just as the war propaganda would have it. In fact, it was now on record that the propaganda started about Hitler in 1933 that he was a murderer was now being made a matter of court record.

      As you can see, nothing really changed from before and after the war but having a court to parade propaganda in front of to offer a semblance of legitimacy to the propaganda. Some may question that a court would not accept such propaganda but this was not the kind of court we are familiar with. Rather it was more like a court run by the legendary Judge Roy Bean.

      For example the court would not permit questioning of any of the claims of mass steamings or electrocutions or gassings or suffocations. That they occurred was accepted as fact without requiring evidence of it happening or bodies or even a reconstruction of the crime scene. There were many more irregularities that, if they had happened in a court in any country but the Soviet Union (of the four allies) would have resulted in at least a mistrial if not a reversal of the conviction, for example jailing witnesses until they told the right story.

      There is a long list of people who condemned the way the tribunal functioned, President John F. Kennedy is among them. It is safe to say that not one person received anything like a fair trial.

      The trials were simply an extension of the war between the jews and the Nazis that the jews had started in 1933 and that can be traced back to the treason of getting the US into WW I. The communists, being primarily jews, were part of the conspiracy.

      That is a serious claim and certainly needs be substantiated. The greatest reason to be suspiscious is also the most likely evidence for it. The Soviets permitted no investigator from any other country to examine the camps where the gassings, steaming, scythings and all the rest were supposed to have occurred.

      Not one investigator from the US, France or England or any other country was allowed to examine the claimed extermination camps. It is difficult to even think of a claim to mass extermination that also prohibits anyone else from looking at the evidence. Here we are with the real crime of the century and no one is permitted to confirm and it and the Soviets decline to offer any physical evidence of it having happened.

      Until the Soviet Union opened up recently it was not possible to go much further. Since then more information has come to light, in particular aerial photos of these extermination camps. They are most enlightening.

      For example, the Soviets claimed in court that Treblinka had been used to kill over a million people and then dismantled so that not a trace was left. They have released aerial photos of it from the time after it was supposed to have been dismantled. It is still there with the same five small buildings and no sign of an mass graves as the time it was supposed to have been in full scale operation.

      Babi Yar is another famous case of mass extermination. But again aerial photos show no signs of any mass grave nor any sign that the vegetation had been disturbed in the least immediately after it was all supposed to have occured.

      In other words, two of the major sites of mass extermination that were claimed by the Soviets show no signs of any such thing. It is clear the Soviets had no interest in presenting these photos at the trial as they would have contradicted the stories of the witneses.

      Another example are the US photos of Birkenau which were available but not released to the court by the US for the trials. A summary is easy to give, they support none of the claims there were any gas chambers there. There are four crematoria flanking some 100 (one hundred) barracks. They are as close to the barracks as the barracks are to each other.

      There is an impression spread that Birkenau was a small camp far from Auschwitz that was chosen for being out of the way for the mass exterminations. Even a cursory look at the aerial photos of Auschwitz and Birkenau shows that Birnenau is at least as big as Auschwitz if not bigger. And far from being remote, they were separated by a distance on the order of the length of the camps themselves.

      The pictures were taken at the height of the supposed gassing but they are not in operation. There is no indication of any mass burning pits or mass graves. There is nothing that supports any of the stories that were presented at Nuremberg.

      Rather than anomolies these are the norm for the gassing stories. They are clearly an extention of the long war of propaganda between jews and communists on one hand and the Nazis on the other.

      And today we live in a world where this part of the story is not permitted to be told. The long war against Germany by the jews and communists that culminates in mass extermination exists as gospels without physical evidence and differs in no way from the anti-Hitler, anti-Nazi propaganda that started in 1933 when they were first called murderers.

      The entire objective of the exercise was the creation of Israel by the Zionist movement within judaism. If we go back to the beginning and the US had stayed out of WW I we can at least say that in 1920 the world would have looked like it did in 1915. Other than that it would have been a much different future.

      As Paul Harvey would say, now you know the rest of the story.

      Thus we see a thread of the political machinations of this time period that connects Zionism, through the Balfour Declaration, German persecution of Communists and then Jews, through the war crimes trials and finally to the State of Israel. Again, it is a minor thread.

      It is expected Britain could have gotten the US into the war without their help. It is clear Britain did not think the Zionists help all that significant as the Balfour Declaration did not go further than a piece of paper until after the next war. But it is clear that if the Communists of the Soviet Union had not portrayed their fellow jews as the ultimate victims Britain would never have followed through with the creation of Israel.