It is an unfortunate fall out of holohuggering that jewish groups have arisen as the only organized enemies of fundamental human rights in the world. They have become the primary instigator for national laws which violate this rights. Even jewish Americans have petitioned the US Congress to invalidate the freedom of speech in matters of their religion. Regardless of what you might think about their position, to do so in unamerican, a failure to uphold the constitution by working to violate it.

     They have also incited criminal and civil actions against those who question their holocaustic beliefs in countries around the world as you can see from the table. And note the pernicious pretexts that have been used. Giving testimony they disapproved of at a trial, expecting a man to violate his oath before his god to tell a story from their religion. It is clearly a battle between religions here and they are the attackers.

     Consider the pretexts of operating a website in another country. In another case just having a website in another country named after him is enough. Not only are they after the traditional forms of freedom of speech and the press but they are going after the internet. When dealing with religious fanatics either leave town until they move on or shoot on sight. There is no way to deal with them rationally.

     There is no secret that these enemies are using their decades of effort to gain editorial control of the media and political clout to advantage. They have the oft exercised power to bring the words they want from the mouths of the great and small.

     As we have seen, the simple mention of jewish control of Hollywood today is enough to bring down the wrath of the jewish establishment. Marlon Brando discovered this new and increasing power when he said on Larry King the same thing he said 20 years earlier in a Playboy interview. From the Playboy interview there was nothing but agreement with the obvious. From the King interview there were accusations of antisemitic for telling the same truth that everyone knows.

     However, when Hollywood produced a two hour documentary seen on A&E after the King interview, it said exactly the same thing. In fact, so close that one can ask if Brando cribbed his comments from the same source. But with that, not a peep.

     With that we note another aspect of the religion, only the keepers of the truth may speak the truth. Remarking upon jewish organizations working against fundamental human liberties is called antisemitic. But when they say the same thing there are no accusations.

     It is often necessary to point out to them that the truth can not be antisemitic. The most blatant response I have seen to that is that "antisemites can tell the truth." It follows from figures don't lie but liars figure.

     In other words, the truth about jewish organizations is to be under the control of those organizations. They shall have control of the time and place and context in which the truth is told. It is an odd position for those who are so facilely mendacious towards others.

     If we were to take their position as general then their position on Pope Pius XII would be not just lies but rank anti-catholicism that otherwise disappeared from the US in the 1950s. One of the issues of holohuggery is that they not only claim control over what happened to them during their holocaust but have expanded to everything related to WWII in Europe. And in that one gets the impression from the, the war was a footnote to their holocaust rather than the other way around.

     They have attacked the historian David Irving for publishing books that do not actively support their position. Irving published a book "Hitler's War" which included references to extermination and such. During later research he realized there were no documents supporting such an extermination. His sin against holocaustianism was to remove references that he could not support by documentation. That was it, the failure to actively promote an issue that is without support.

     With that "sin" a world wide campaign was started against him. And he had now documented that it was conducted by jewish organizations.

     Organized Jews attacking freedom of the press, freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of thought. All are fundamental human rights.

     But anyone commenting upon their actions is attacked as antisemitic even though the truth can not be antisemitic. The civilized world has delegated no one as the keeper of any truth. It is a human right to search for the truth and come to any conclusion regardless with who disagrees with it.

     There is no freedom of inquiry if at the end there is only one permitted conclusion. That form of freedom is one that is truly slavery. And here we see who would be slavemasters of the mind.

     I am not going to give their side of it. You can go to their websites and find it. You will find their arguments good material to study for the methods of propaganda. They are liberally mixed with "for the children" maudlin rhetoric right out of Hillary Clinton's speeches.

     Do not believe me. Read it for yourself. But from them note, they do not want you to read my views. I invite comparison; they fear it. The Simon Wiesenthal Center is promoting blocking software that includes political, historical and social opinions they disagree with. They want you saved from the likes of me.

     And when you read their sites note they are very narrow minded. Anyone who disagrees with their WWII views is labeled a Nazi or equivalent. That is how simplistic their minds are. They are incapable of conceiving anything else.

     They are like christian fundies who declare if you do not believe in creationism you are a godless Darwinist. Like the jewish fundies they can not conceive of anything else.

     Dr. Frederick Toben, an Australian Historian currently (June 1999) in prison in Germany for operating a website in Australia, has described reviewing events of WWII as the last intellectual adventure of the 20th century. And certainly it is the first such adventure of the 21st century. But is it more than that.

     It is a battle of reason against blind faith. Analytic thought against childlike credulousness. And it is a battle because there are battlelines and there are enemies of human liberties. And those enemies are happy to tell you who they are but solicite your contributions to help them be the enemy.

     I do not have to call them enemies. If you have even the most basic understanding of human rights then you will recognize them for what they are because they will proudly tell you what they are.

     What we have to answer is why all of these organizations are jewish organizations. But until there is a explanation, the truth can not be antisemitic.