Rather than even a token statement of appreciation if gratitude is too much, we get accusations that not enough was done for them. Rather than even silence we get accusations. It is called kvetching.

      Kvetch is a yiddish term for whining and complaining. It is based upon an implicite belief they know better than anyone else. They arrive at this belief by telling each other they know better than anyone else without getting a reality check to see if it is true or not.

     The most common complaint is that the Allies knew there was gassing but refused to bomb the railroad lines. This is one of those mindlessly spurious imaginary complaints that has been elevated to dogmatic liturgy solely so they have something to complain about.

     Let us examine the issue in detail. If such an undertaking were to be considered it would have the preliminary requirements of credibility and feasability. Both would have to be satisfied.

     In the Auschwitz gassing case credibility rests upon confirmation of the reports. The nature of the reports was such that most of them were clearly fictional and were not confirmable. We forget these days that there were impossible reports of mass extermination by electrified floor and similarly laughable methods.

     In other words, no matter who said it, no matter who reported it, there were so many ridiculous things being reported there was no way to give any of them any serious credibility. The reports had no consistancy. There were reports of things that were so ridiculous at the time and still so ridiculous today that not even the most ardent holohugger believes them.

     Therefore saying the Allies should have believed them, when at least nine out of ten reports are positively known to be false, is entirely self-serving. It is clearly malicious to say the Allies should have believed the reports.

     However there was a common thread to all of these stories, huge numbers of bodies being disposed of by cremation or burning. That was a very simple thing to check. Aerial photos would show burning pits, piles of coal, huge deforestation for fuel or whatever was being used.

     And aerial photos were taken of Birkenau, right when it was supposed to be at its peak.

     The analysis of those aerial photos indicated exactly nothing that would confirm any of the extermination stories. There was no evidence of any cremations at all much less tens of thousands of them per day. While there were political reasons given for not bombing, the most obvious one is quite clear. From the aerial photos, the reports had no credibility.

     I have to note at this point that holohuggers are also brain damaged in their inability to comprend the necessity for physical evidence no matter how many times it is explained to them. It may be good in fact to take the admonishement given after "doubting Thomas" to believe and have not seen but this is reality not a religion. It may be a religion for holohuggers but not for people outside their ethnic religion.

     They may believe as they will. For myself, I have no interest in adopting a religion that requires its adherents to reject the necessity, the sine qua non of physical evidence. All scientific progress has depended upon requiring physical evidence. Their religion is a step back to the Dark Ages.

     And as the reports had no credibility there was no cause to formulate any plan to do anything. If there was to be a plan to stop something, one had to be evidence of what there was to stop. There was no evidence of anything out of the ordinary.

     I could leave it there but the entire contingent of holohuggers is intellectually and emotionally incapable of grasping the obvious. The lack of physical evidence is something that just does not register on their crippled minds. But there are people reading this who are not adherents of the religion.

      Therefore, I will analyze the feasability what they propose. I have no expectation that this exposition of what is well known about WWII bombing will impact upon their crippled minds. I write this for the interested and for those who may have heard their religious rantings and been mislead by them. Unimpaired people can grasp the obvious.

     What they say should have been done for them is that the rail lines or the crematoria or both should have been bombed. Remember first that crematoria are not gas chambers so getting rid of the crematoria would do nothing to get rid of gas chambers.

     Note another example of the chinese menu approach. For arguments like this they want crematoria and gas chambers to be the same thing. For other arguments they want them separate such as in the separate morgues they are currently calling gas chambers at Birkenau. If we take the argument for the separate morgues then the argument for bombing is clearly absurd.

      They claim already that when the crematoria broke down or there were too many bodies they were burned in outdoor pits. They can not have it that getting rid of the crematoria would have worked when at the same time they claim open air burning was used. (This is another chinese menue example.) Note of course, their claims for the capacity and capability for both are clearly impossible but that does not register on them either.

     Next a commonly known fact to anyone who is old enough to have watched the Gulf War as a 1990-91 season special on TV. You will remember this from the great things said about smart bombs and from the TV footage we were treated to every day. They were hailed as being accurate when iron bombs, WWII style bombs, were not.

     When it comes to the dumb iron bombs of WWII we have something else entirely. If a target is large enough, like a factory or a building much larger than the crematoria buildings, ten percent of iron bombs might hit it. That means nine out of ten are going to hit surrounding targets. As they were much smaller than factories, much less than 10% of the bombs might hit them. A shotgun in a rifle competition is a nearly perfect analogy, except a shotgun would likely be more accurate.

     Attempting to destroy the crematoria, in addition to not doing a thing about the imaginary gassing, would do little more than level the camp and the surrounding barracks killing tens of thousands. Tens of thousands would have been killed to accomplish nothing.

     One of the differences between christian and jewish morality is in Christianity the innocent should not be sacrificed. In the case of the moral conflict of sacrificing some for others there must be a distinct moral benefit such as bombing Hiroshima or Dresden knowing there were POWs in in the cities. Knowing the tens of thousands of women, children and elderly would also die is another moral issue entirely.

     With the suggestion of bombing the crematoria and also hearing the reports of open air burning then by the very nature of the reports, bombing the crematoria could have no benefit. Therefore there was no justification to start killing innocents to no benefit at all.

     This is another example of the "chinese menu" approach they take to their holocaust. To make a point they pick one fact from column A another from column B and a further one from column C to support their argument. In this method it is essential to practice intellectual dishonesty by ignoring facts that contradict and negate their position.

     In this case they want to ignore the open air burning that negates any possible benefit to destroying the crematoria even if it were possible.

     Despite the Movietone News voice overs saying that the Allies were bombing the railroad lines, that was only being done by low level fighter bombers. They never had the range to reach Auschwitz. And the rail lines were secondary targets down on the list of nothing better could be found.

     When it comes to strategic bombing of rail switchyards they were big enough to hit. They were much larger than factories. When they were hit, complex switching equipment was destroyed not just sections of steel rail. And the surveyors and the engineers had to be called in to aid in repairing things. And that takes time and stopped dozens of separate lines while repairs were made.

     Compare that to trying to hit a single railroad line out in the country. Even IF it were one hit in a bombload a grunt level repair crew goes out to fix it. Only one rail line is being repaired, a few wooden ties replaced, maybe a rail steel rail needing to be replaced. It is repaired by the end of the day. And in that time, only one line is shut down. It is better to destroy one repair train than hit the line in a dozen places.

     For the above reasons single rail lines were way down on the targeting list for even low level fighter bombers. They were a place to leave their bombs behind if no better target could be found.

     In all of this, no matter how many times matters of common knowledge are pointed out, it does not register on the members of The Holocaust Religion. Get even the smallest part of it through to them and the next day it is as though they learned nothing.

      Perhaps they confess their temporary loss of faith and regain it. No one knows. It is a mystery.