In the year 2000 Israel said there were one million holocaust survivors
still alive and many are in financial need. That number is corroborated
close enough by other Jewish sources. Survivor implies something escapes
by the skin of one's teeth and it certainly is terrible that so many are in
financial need. Cue the extortion music. [urls to official claims of this
As we know the average life expectancy giving a number of people alive in a
year is the same as giving the percentage alive in that year to a first
order approximation. In giving a number Israel also gave the percent.
The problem is the average life span in 2000 for Europeans was about 75
years. The year 2000 was 55 years after the end of it. So if all ages
from newborn to the elderly were among the survivors then 55/75th have died
since 1945 and the number alive in 2000 equals 20/75th of the number in
1945, a bit less than 1/3 of them.
Elementary algebra says if there were one million alive in the year 2000
then there were 3.75 million holocaust survivors alive in 1945. That is a
But wait! There's more! [Cue Popiel slice and dice logo]
If the Nazis killed those unable to work it gets worse. Lets assume 13 years
old is old enough to work. So in 1945 the youngest survivor was 13. That
means it is as though there were one million survivors in the year 2012. As
that is 67 years after it ended then 67/75ths have died and one million
represents 8/75ths of the survivors in 1945. That means there were roughly
9.375 million holocaust survivors in 1945.
Pick any unable-to-work age you want down to newborn and still we are left
with 3.5 million in 1945 as the minimum number of holocaust survivors. But
if we have newborns surviving then we have a good fraction of women taking
care of the children and thus not working. That weighs against the
trademarked Pure Nazi Evil. Not working everyone to death stains the
trademark of Pure Nazi Evil.
Addendum June 10, 2007
However one million is a conveniently round number. Perhaps it was an early
estimate and in error. In 2004 Israel issued a more refined number still
alive in that year, 1,092,000, for the purpose of actually filing lawsuits.
So 59 years after the event 16/75s were still alive. That leaves us with
5,118,750 alive in 1945 if none were killed for inability to work and the
birthrate were the same as peacetime. If we go with those under 13 being
killed we have 27,300,000 holocaust survivors alive in 1945. This is nearly
twice as many Jews as were in all the world in 1938.
the original article.
We must conclude the official numbers asserted for purposes of claiming
compensation are either lies for the purpose of extortion or there was no
extermination in the holy holocaust. And if the former is a lie, lying in
one leads to a reasonable assumption of lying in all and it is up to the
liar to show he is not lying this time.
OTOH we can look at the 1945 Red Cross numbers for all concentration camp
survivors as 120,000. That means there should be 33,000 survivors today
assuming no extermination of those unable to work. Assuming extermination of
those unable to work as under 13 we have roughly 10,000 survivors. If we
expand camp survivors to those who survived by hiding either their identity
or physically perhaps the number can be doubled or even tripled before one
cannot keep a straight face saying it.
Norman Finkelstein quotes his mother as asking, If all of these people are
survivors, who did Hitler kill?
I can add to her consternation. Every conceivable modification to the data
short of a fountain of youth for holocaust survivors, short of increasing
their life expectancy, increases the number of survivors in 1945. Evan a
million survivors in 1945 (no one died in 55 years) begs the question of
what does holocaust mean.
So just how many Jews were their in Europe during WWII?
From this copy of a newspaper article
we can see there were 8.9 million Jews in Europe going into the war. [The entire image by country is here.] This
is the population numbers reported by Jews. So with just shy of 9 million in
all of Europe going into the war, losing the magic 6 million during the war
and having nearly 4 million survivors of the holocaust part of the war is
clearly not possible.
The suggestion there was a natural population increase between 1938 and 1945
requires Jews to have produced children at a rate at least equal to what
would have occurred had there been no war and no extermination and not even
concentration camps. In fact with all the Jewish claims of zero population
growth the claim of natural growth is not credible.
It only approaches credibility if the story of immediately killing those
who could not work is either a total lie or so rare it is not worth
mentioning. With killing those who were unable to work means there were more
holocaust survivors in 1945 than there were Jews in Europe in 1938. So the
claim of killing those to young to work is clearly one of the many lies told
as absolute truth by holohuggers. It is clearly impossible to have more
survivors alive in 1945 than there were Jews in Europe.
In a larger context we can look at the distribution of Jews in Europe during
WWII and at its maximum expansion only 3 to 4 million Jews lived under Nazi
rule. Taking the official number of one million without extermination of
those unable to work we have every Jew who was at any time under Nazi rule
claiming to be a holocaust survivor.
So again, who did Hitler kill? Certainly he did not kill those unable to
work. Also he clearly did not kill women with infants to care for else the
infants would have died.
As Maxwell Smart might say about the extermination, Missed it by that
The more I think about this the more I think Israel should be commended for
putting the interests of the survivors, whomever they are defined to be,
ahead of their national interest in perpetrating the gas chamber and
 Life expectancy in 1945 was on the order of 67 years overall for Europe
but included unsanitary eastern Europe of about 10 years shorter where most
of this holocaust is supposed to have happened. However this changes nothing
as those who had the poor lifestyle as young adults in eastern Europe would
be dead before 2000 even if they had a 75 year life expectancy in 1945. This
75 year life expectancy applies mainly to the youngest in 1945. On average
it applies to those 20 and younger in 1945.
 The first approximation rule of demographics is there an equal number in
all age groups. To make it easy, say the population is 75 million. That
would mean 1 million aged 0-1, 1 million age 1-2 and so forth up to 1
million aged 74-75. Of course no population is a first order approximation.
But all the interesting aspects of demographics are departures from this
ideal. For purposes of this discussion the only interest is the Z-shaped
curve around the average life expectancy. These days the Z-curve has a large
number living much longer than the average but in fact there is an equally
large number dying before the average age. If it were otherwise the average
life expectancy would increase so the same considerations are always true.
They are kept true by moving the baseline. It is also true that 75 is not
good for all European countries but it is close enough for this exercise.
 In this case "close enough" means there is no official source of the
number rather there is a ballpark range of numbers that different groups
adopt as the true number.
-- X population-in-1945 = 1,000,000
population-in-1945 = 1,000,000 X --