How to lie like an Israeli
by Matt Giwer, © 2001 [July]

First give this a read. How can you tell when a Zionist is lying? His lips are moving.

Since we can't see his lips we have to deal with the quotes.

"For too long, the Palestinian narrative of international law and rights has gone unchallenged," he said, charging that Palestinians' response to it proved they were "acting like spoilt children who have had their way for too long."

Israel captured the West Bank from Jordan and the Gaza Strip from Egypt in the 1967 Six Day War with Arab neighbors - in an "act of self-defense," Ayalon says.

It has since adopted the stance that these were not "occupied," but "disputed territories," but this view is not shared by many [ANY] in the international community who regard the territories as occupied and Israeli settlements built in them as illegal.

Israel says Jordanian sovereignty over the West Bank, when it controlled the territory between 1949 and 1967, was never recognized except by two states.

Since no other sovereignty was ever recognized over it, the West Bank should enjoy the same status as the Western Sahara and legally be described as "disputed," not as "occupied territory," says Ayalon.

There are two notable lies here. There was no prior recognized sovereignty over Gaza despite the fact the Egypt's claim of sovereignty was recognized by the world. Thus this is an admission of the exact war crime he is trying to lie his way out of.

The other lie is so incredibly absurd one has to wonder if this man ever received any form of education. The Ottoman Empire claimed sovereignty over this land for centuries. That sovereignty was recognized by the world for centuries.

Thus we have two Israeli lies which, when the truth is considered exposes again the jewish war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank which includes Jerusalem.

For perspective no country in the world recognizes Israeli sovereignty over Gaza, the Golan Heights, Jerusalem or the West Bank. The uneducated and perhaps illiterate twit does not understand he is making an argument based upon recognition. If his argument is to be taken as legitimate he is damning Israel.

As one who damns Israel he is very late to the party of the righteous.


The problem with talking about WWII is it is almost certain
someone with a bad case of Third Reich Syndrome will go 
berserk and start preaching.
	-- The Iron Webmaster, 2343