The Evil of Gambling
by
Matt Giwer (c) 1994 <11/17>
There are still people out there
who hold that illegal gambling is evil. It is time to put some
facts on the table.
- Fact, every state with legal gambling takes a greater
percentage than the Mafia ever imagined.
- Fact, every state with legal gambling takes a percentage
that is illegal in Nevada.
- Fact, anyone choosing a legal state lottery when they have
an illegal gambling operation is an idiot.
I would hope this is clear enough as we are talking a
victimless crime here. And if "illegal" gambling has victims
then they are even greater victims when they deal with legal
state lotteries.
"Illegal" gambling, except for numbers games, deals with
people betting their skill to determine the outcome against other
people. That is in horse racing, sporting events, all the rest.
The games that are not skill are the only ones used by the
states. And in choosing those games they have negated skill as a
determining factor. That is quite socialist but then what are
our states? Knowledge and ability shall have no effect upon the
outcome. All players are considered equal.
- Fact, were the gambling laws of the state of Nevada
regarding payoff rates to become nationwide every state lottery
would be shut down for an illegal house percentage. The
percentage is much too high.
I am not going to bore you will all the statistics. The
lowest state take in the country is 25%. States taking 1/3rd are
more common. Organized crime gambling takes 10%. Tell me, which
is the best organized criminal?
Now you go to Las Vegas and the take depends upon the game
but there is no secret what that take is. Take a cruise outside
the three mile limit and play the casino and there is no secret
what the percentage is. The only difference with a cruise is
that you trust the cruise line to run an honest game but a
dishonest game comes under federal piracy laws so don't worry.
But what is the point of arguing against the evil of illegal
gambling when every accusation against it applies to legal
gambling? What is the point of making games of skill illegal
while holding legal games of zero skill legal while they pay out
less money than than the "criminals"?
Who are the criminals in this case? The states of course.
As I have noted it goes further than this. The states are in
fact while claiming only their type of gambling is legal are also
declaring they have the right to do everything they use to
justify holding other forms of gambling illegal and at the same
time returning less money to the participants in their legal
gambling.
Pick your excuse for holding gambling illegal. It harms
people because some percentage will spend all they have on the
gamble. Here is a lesson for those with that argument. There is
NO WAY that any state prevents that from happening AND if they
are bright enough to go to illegal gambling places they will be
less poor.
A clear lesson. These legal lotteries are the crime by
every means of judging gambling to be a crime which has victims.
Gambling is a victimless crime. It always has been and
always will be but by taking the element of skill out of the game
and with their payoffs all states with lotteries create more
victims than anything they call illegal.
Is there really any question that people feel the states are
the criminals? Arrest a bookie. Fine. He gives a more fair
game than the state.
What is the point of letting
states get away with this? Of course, they have to protect their
citizens from themselves without jeopardizing their own greater
"evil."
Gambling is in fact a crime
without a victim. And the way the states are legalizing it, the
states commit the greater crime. We need a wholesale end to laws
against gambling across the nation. The sooner the better.