Time for real change
by
Matt Giwer (c) 1995 <2/4>
There appears to be a
half-baked, ill considered bill headed for the desk of the
President. That will be a bill against unfunded mandates being
put on the states without a cost/benefit analysis. The problem
is not that business is not included with the states. The
problems is that it only takes a simple majority to over-ride
this law.
At present the federal
government can pass a law requiring state and local governments
to spend all the money necessary to do anything it wishes and
demand damages in court for non-compliance. With this law in
place a simple majority will not be able to do that unless the
new law states that a cost/benefit analysis is not required and a
simple majority passes it.
In other words, there has
been no change. This is the best response to the 10th Amendment
resolution Gingrich can come up with that he can get passed in
the House and the Senate is still problematic as is Clinton's
signature. In other words, they think they have gotten their
feet out of the fire.
No way. If this is the
best they can do, fine. The states can do better. They can join
a new nation without a Constitutional Convention. There is no
need for months or years of wrangling.
I propose that the states
simply join the Allied States of America. As its constitution I
propose that the present United States Constitution be adopted in
its entirety with two changes.
The first change being
that in the preamble "We, the people of the United States" the
words "people" and "United" be stricken and replaced with the
words "states" and "Allied" respectively.
The second change is that
the 16th Amendment, the income tax amendment, be stricken
completely and the succeeding amendments be re-numbered.
These two simple changes
will make a very simple and straight forward and hard to object
to change. It does not invoke the nameless terrors of a
Constitutional Convention. It is a simple proposal that the
states can consider individually without awaiting a law or an
amendment to the present constitution from the present Congress.
As for procedural matters
for ratification of this constitution for this new country that
would be left to the individual states. It would appear prudent
to suggest that the states announce it will be on the agenda
following the next election such that it can be platform issue
for candidates to the state legislatures and governorships. That
way there could be no objection that the people of the states
were not given their chance to speak in the creation of the new
country.
There would be details
that would need be worked out between the United and the Allied
states such as a proportionate share of debts and obligations.
Of course the new Allied states would have the option of
selectively defaulting on them but that is a separate issue.
The issue of United
States Government property within the states of the Allied State
would be a matter of ambassadorial negotiation. Although the
obvious title to such properties and lands would revert to the
states of the Allied States it is the shooting over such property
that was the start of the Civil War. It is essential to resist
the impulse to draw first blood. It is essential that there be
no call to arms and no threats.
As for new systems and
new activities such as Immigration and Customs, fortunately such
personnel are disbursed throughout the states and they can simply
be offered their same job with the new government. US dollars
can remain legal tender until a better system is devised to
replace them. There is no real cause for any problem with the
transition save if the United States is not willing to convey to
the Allied States such items and federal pension and social
security trust funds.
The new Allied States
could then adopt whatever laws from the United States it deems
valuable with perhaps an interim stipulation that they are all in
force for two years or so, giving enough time to adopt or reject
the national laws.
At the same time all of
the laws which bind the states and the people that are not
constitutional matters would be null and void as the constitution
of the Allied States is clearly consented to by the states only
and it can not extend to the states themselves or the people of
the states. This difference cleanly cuts any power of the new
allied government from ability to intrude into the rights of the
states or the individual.
The exclusion of the
income tax amendment cleanly ends the most powerful social
engineering tool available to such a government. Many states
survive very well upon a set of taxes that are independent of
individual income. That the states will have to work out a way
to finance the Allied Government by some other means is certainly
a task to which they are able. Certainly the greatly reduced size
of that government will make such financing much easier.
This is the cleanest way
to hold the Republican Congress's feet to the fire. As they do
not appear willing to deliver on state's rights then they are
going to watch the peaceful dissolution of the United States. If
the last election is any indication the people of the states will
certainly vote for state legislators who will ratify this
slightly modified constitution and form a new nation.
If this does not work,
nothing will short of revolution.