The Weaver Execution
by
Matt Giwer (c) 1995 <10/31>
I have taken a while to write on
the Senate hearing on the Ruby Ridge incident. If you followed
it there was quite a bit to obscure the crucial salient issue.
Vickie Weaver was executed.
Through all of the detail and
all of the facts of the case and all of the speculation
surrounding it one thing is clear. There was an execution.
Discarding all of the
material that has no relevance to this central issue, the FBI
showed up, attempted to execute two people and in the process
executed a third. Although the FBI had plans to announce their
presence, they had not done so. Although the FBI had plans to
demand a surrender, they had not done so.
They got in place and without
telling the Weavers they were there, opened fire.
Given the way the press
covered the story you would imagine there was the kind of scene
you expect on TV and in the movies. Someone with a bullhorn
saying something like, "This is the FBI. You are under arrest.
Come out with your hands up."
Rather events at Ruby Ridge
were like the police getting behind their cars for protection and
opening fire. If the word execution does not fit, then try
assassination. That there was a sniper doing the killing with a
rifle makes it all the more appropriate.
There is no practical
difference between what happened at Ruby Ridge and the police
shooting a suspect in the back without attempting an arrest.
Good intentions are fine. There is a rather famous road paved
with them.
The FBI and the Senate panel
did their best to put a different spin on it. They treated it
more like the expected TV scenario had actually taken place, or
that the intention was good enough, and failed to address the
missing action. That is after the fact complicity in the spin
doctoring.
There is a purported police
assassination squad operating in Los Angeles. A movie was made
on the theme a few years ago. This is no different unless good
intentions can excuse identical actions and results. This is not
Dirty Harry Callaghan; this is Paul Kersey's Death Wish, except
it was done by the police.
Perhaps it is a mixture of TV
and the movie "justice" of those characters that makes this
palatable. The excuses for this execution are in the "he asked
for it" style. It is the "blame the victim" or "she was asking
to be raped" mindset.
This country walks a very
crooked line in its concept of justice and law. In the common
mind, what the person deserves depends upon the allegation. A
man never leaving a monestary since he was 14 should the shot if
accused of child abuse. We can try the corpse later.
Child abuse worked in Waco
even though never proved at the time and still having only one
questionable allegant to this day. At Ruby Ridge the claim was
that a marshal was murdered while an arrest was attempted even
though there was no arrest attempt. That is enough to tip public
opinion in favor of a Paul Kersey style execution. Never mind
there was not enough evidence of it to stand in court.
The framework within which
facts are viewed is more important than the fact themselves. "I
come to bury Caesar, not to praise him," turned the crowd against
the man who singlehandedly ended the democracy of Rome and lead
the way to centuries of tyranny by emperors. In Ruby Ridge,
ignore the facts. Think of it as dealing with a cop killer.
Of course there are always
extenuating circumstances but there were none given in any of the
testimony that would relate to showing up and shooting without
the crucial announcement of being there intervening. The nearest
claim is that there was an attempt to fire on a helicopter, a
quite strange thing for a Special Forces, Vietnam veteran to even
think about. But even then, that makes only one person a target
until he stops shooting. It is not carte blanche to kill
everyone in sight.
In any event, taking away all
the excuses and all the finger pointing, what we have is a
federal execution. It is not a pleasant thing to realize but
then murder is never pleasant.