|
Have you heard so much about it you lost interest? Has what you heard been
so hopelessly complicated you have given up? Here is all you need to know
and all there is to know about the subject.
Jews stole the land. The owners want it back.
There you have the sum and substance of the entire conflict.
Everything else
you have ever
heard about it
is nothing more than
trying to avoid
this very
simple and obvious expression of the entire conflict.
The Jews, euphemistically called the Zionists or the Israelis, did in fact
steal the land from the Palestinians. They actually bought and paid for at
most 9% of it. In 1948 they took over 73% of it. Do the math. They expelled
750,000 Palestinians from their land and stole it. Most of the 200,000 or so
they did not manage to expel were driven off their land into ghettos and
their land was stolen. If you are not a Jew in Israel you have as much
chance for justice as a Black in the South a century ago.
You may have heard the Palestinians did not really own it but rather
landlords in Turkey or Egypt owned the land and the Palestinians just
rented. I do not know where this quibble is supposed to lead. It is an
admission of theft. The only disagreement is from whom it was stolen.
Beyond the who it was stolen from being a silly argument, Israel passed a
set of absentee owner laws. Because of them the government ownership of the
land increased from that maximum of 9% to 92%. The very existence of the
absentee owner laws demonstrates the legitimacy of ownership and the fact of
theft. Using the color of law to steal merely compounds the crime.
Additionally those who attempted to return to their property, who attempted
not to be absent, where murdered as infiltrators. This was often a cottage
industry and the owners were given the privilege of digging their own graves
before being murdered by Jewish vigilantes.
You may have heard the holy holocaust made it necessary. Problem with that
is the plans to steal someone's land were laid before Hitler was born. The
decision to steal Palestine was made before the first world war when Hitler
was just a struggling artist in Vienna. The open use of violence by Zionists
started while Hitler was in prison for the Beer Hall Putsch and writing Mein
Kampf.
But even after their holocaust, does that mean Palestinians have to suffer?
If there was a case to be made based upon their holocaust they might have a
strong case for claiming Bavaria or some other part of Germany.
Historical claims, real or biblical, have no standing in society. If they
really believe their god gave the land to them then they have a gripe with
their god for taking it away from them. They have no complaint with the
Palestinians. Besides, the Palestinians are simply people whose ancestors
were Jews but converted to Islam.
No, the UN did not give the land to the Jews. The land was not the UN's to
give. The UN only recognized the Jewish government of Israel while demanding
the return of the Palestinians to their land and property. Sovereignty is
not ownership.
There are dozens of other transparent arguments which try to cover the
simple facts of Jewish theft and the stolen private property of the
Palestinians. They are all attempts to divert the discussion from these two
simple facts.
- Jews stole the land.
- The owners want it back.
Be diverted if you wish. But never say it is more complicated than those two
simple statements.
|